Academic Paper

Hermeneutics


A lecture or presentation titled 'Hermeneutics in Every Day Life' by Joost Holleman, delivered in Leiden on November 19, 1996. The text uses the metaphorical 'exegesis' of a stop sign to satirically illustrate various interpretive approaches to a text, including postmodern deconstruction, Marxist class conflict, Catholic tradition, fundamentalist literalism, homiletic word studies, Jewish Talmudic commentary, Pharisaic legalism, Jesuit historical criticism, and New Testament/Old Testament scholarly theories regarding source criticism (Q), redaction, and textual emendation.

HERMENEUTICS IN EVERY DAY LIFE Joost Holleman, Leiden 11/19/96

Suppose you're travelling to work and you see a stop sign. What do you Do? That depends on how you exegete the stop sign.

A postmodernist deconstructs the sign (knocks it over with his car), ending forever the tyrany of the north-south traffic over the east-west traffic.

Similarly, a Marxist sees a stop sign as an instrument of class conflict. He concludes that the bourgeoisie use the north-south road and obstruct the progress of the workers on the east-west road.

3. A serious and educated Catholic believes that he cannot understand the stop sign apart from its interpretive community and their tradition. Observing that the interpretive community doesn't take it too seriously, he doesn't feel obligated to take it too seriously either.

An average Catholic (or Orthodox or Coptic or Anglican or Methodist or Presbyterian or whatever) doesn't bother to read the sign but he'll stop if the car in front of him does.

5. A fundamentalist, taking the text very literally, stops at the stop sign and waits for it to tell him to go.

6. A preacher might look up "STOP" in his lexicons of English and discover that it can mean: 1) something which prevents motion, such as a plug for a drain, or a block of wood that prevents a door from closing; 2) a location where a train or bus lets off passengers. The main point of his sermon the following Sunday on this text is: when you see a stop sign, it is a place where traffic is naturally clogged, so it is a good place to let off passengers from your car.

7. An orthodox Jew does one of two things: 1) Take another route to work that doesn't have a stop sign so that he doesn't run the risk of disobeying the Law. 2) Stop at the stop sign, say "Blessed art thou, 0 Lord our God, king of the universe, who hast given us thy commandment to stop," wait 3 seconds according to his watch, and then proceed.

Incidentally, the Talmud has the following comments on this passage: R[abbi] Meir says: He who does not stop shall not live long. R. Hillel says: Cursed is he who does not count to three before proceeding. R. Simon ben Yudah says: Why three? Because the Holy One, blessed be He, gave us the Law, the Prophets, and the Writings. R. ben Isaac says: Because of the three patriarchs. R. Yehuda says: Why bless the Lord at a stop sign? Because it says: "Be still, and know that I am God" R. Hezekiel says: When Jephthah returned from defeating the Ammonites, the Holy One, blessed be He, knew that a donkey would run out of the house and overtake his daughter; but Jephthah did not stop at the stop sign, and the donkey did not have time to come out. For this reason he saw his daughter first and lost her. Thus he was judged for his transgression at the stop sign. R. Gamaliel says: R. Hillel, when he was a baby, never spoke a word, though his parents tried to teach him by speaking and showing him the words on a scroll. One day his father was driving through town and did not stop at the sign. Young Hillel called out: "Stop, father!" In this way, he began reading and speaking at the same time. Thus it is written: "Out of the mouth of babes." R. ben Jacob says: Where did the stop sign come from? Out of the sky, for it is written: "Forever, 0 Lord, your word is fixed in the heavens." R. ben Nathan says: When were stop signs created? On the fourth day, for it is written "let them serve as signs." R. Yeshuah says:... [continues for three more pages]

8. A Pharisee does the same thing as an orthodox Jew, except that he waits 10seconds instead of 3. He also replaces his brake lights with 1000 watt searchlights and connects his horn so that it is activated whenever he touches the brake pedal.

9. A scholar from a Jesuit seminary concludes that the passage "STOP" undoubtedly was never uttered by Jesus himself, but belongs entirely to stage III of the gospel tradition, when the church was first confronted by traffic in its parking lot.

10. A New Testament scholar notices that there is no stop sign on Mark street but there is one on Matthew and Luke streets, and concludes that the ones on and Matthew streets are both copied from a sign on a completely hypothetical street called "Q". There is an excellent 300 page discussion of speculations on the origin of these stop signs and the differences between the stop signs on Matthew and Luke street in the scholar's commentary on the passage. There is an unfortunate omission in the commentary, however; the author apparently forgot to explain what the text means.

11. A~ Old Testament scholar points out that there are a number of stylistic differences between the first and second half of the passage "STOP". For example, "ST" contains no enclosed areas and 5 line endings, whereas "OP" contains two enclosed areas and only one line termination He concludes that the author for the second part is different from the author for the first part and probably lived hundreds of years later. Later scholars determine that the second half is itself actually written by two separate authors because of similar stylistic differences between the “O” and the “P”.

12. Another prominent OT scholar notes in his commentary that the stop sign would fit better into the context three streets back. (Unfortunately, he neglected to explain why in his commentary.) Clearly it was moved to its present location by a later redactor. He thus exegetes the intersection as though the stop sign were not there.

13. Because of the difficulties in interpretation, another OT scholar emends the text, changing "T" to "H". "SHOP" is much easier to understand in context than "STOP" because of the multiplicity of stores in the area. The textual corruption probably occurred because "SHOP" is so similar to "STOP" on the sign several streets back that it is a natural mistake for a scribe to make. Thus the sign should be interpreted to announce the existence of a shopping area.

5.5 TIME \@ "h:mm AM/PM" 5:44 PM DATE \@ "MM/dd/yy" 06/06/10

Cite this document

Carver, Frank G. “Hermeneutics.” Academic Paper, n.d.. The Frank G. Carver Archive.

Related in the archive


Lecture

Andrey Khobnya Proverbs 1-9

A research paper or lecture by Andrey Khobnya, South-Russia District Educational Coordinator and Pastor of the Light of Hope Church of the Nazarene, examining the theological and pedagogical principles within Proverbs 1–9. The author challenges the scholarly perception of ancient Israelite education as merely harsh or corporal, proposing instead that the text demonstrates more nuanced educational methods and theological assumptions. The document specifically explores the use of 'address' as a method of instruction, where personified wisdom appeals to learners in public spaces, and outlines the structural and didactic features of the first nine chapters of Proverbs.

Proverbs 1:7 · Proverbs 1:20-33 · Proverbs 8:1-11

Lecture

Chapter 19 - Christology Today - On Lord Jesus Christ

Lecture notes focusing on the Chalcedonian definition of Christ, specifically the doctrine of the Hypostatic Union. The author argues against the common misinterpretation of the doctrine as a mere 'two natures' theory, asserting instead that it is the union of two natures in one Person (hypostasis). The text explores the logic of the 'One-in-two' structure, referencing the Philippians 2:6-11 hymn (Carmen Christi) to illustrate a movement from God's descent to humanity to the exaltation of the human representative. The lecture also addresses the distinction between 'high' and 'low' Christology, the concept of paradox in Christology, and includes devotional hymns centered on the person of Jesus Christ.

Philippians 2:6-11

Book Chapter

Commentary Draft 1 John 4 Chapter for submission to Rick

A draft commentary on 1 John 4:1-21, divided into sections titled 'Behind the Text' and 'In the Text.' The author examines the use of dualistic language (e.g., Spirit of God vs. spirit of the antichrist) in the Johannine epistles, noting connections to the Gospel of John and the shared vocabulary of the Qumran community. The text explores the biblical concept of false prophets, drawing comparisons to Old Testament figures (Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel) and New Testament warnings in the Synoptic Gospels. The commentary further analyzes the Greek imperative to 'test the spirits' (dokimazete), discussing the linguistic nuances of testing and the practical application of Christian love as a means of discerning truth and demonstrating God's presence.

1 John 4:1-21 · 1 John 4:1-6 · 1 John 4:3

Book Chapter

Edited Introduction: 1 Peter

An introductory essay concerning the First Epistle of Peter, discussing the prominence of the apostle Peter in the Gospel tradition and the historical 'neglect' of the Petrine epistles in modern scholarship. The document examines the debate over Petrine authorship, weighing early Patristic evidence (including Irenaeus, Tertullian, and Clement of Alexandria) against five modern scholarly objections: lack of familiarity with Jesus, theological development, Greek style, dependence on Pauline thought, and the post-apostolic time period. The text also touches upon the themes of suffering, communal holiness, and the importance of Christian virtues such as hospitality and humility in the face of societal opposition.

1 Peter · 2 Peter · Mark 3:13-19